• About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Saturday, June 28, 2025
Diplotic
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Diplomacy
  • Economy
  • Fact Check
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Nature & Environment
  • Health & Lifestyle
  • Games & Sports
  • South Asia
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Diplomacy
  • Economy
  • Fact Check
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Nature & Environment
  • Health & Lifestyle
  • Games & Sports
  • South Asia
No Result
View All Result
Diplotic
No Result
View All Result
Home Diplomacy

France Wants a European Defense System—But Who Will Pay for It?

Adnan Tahsin by Adnan Tahsin
February 7, 2025
in Diplomacy
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
0
Defence
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

When EU leaders gather Monday in Brussels to discuss the future of European defense, it will be France against (almost) everyone else. Paris is holding firm to its position that European taxpayer money should be spent on military systems designed and made in Europe.

“A lot has been done already, but we need to do more. We need to do it better, stronger, and faster—and we need to do it together,” Antonio Costa, the president of the European Council of EU leaders, said after the summit on defense in Brussels.

RelatedArticles

Between Dragons and Eagles: Pakistan at the Heart of an Indo-Pacific Rivalry

Why Does Palestine Shape New York’s Local Elections?

Is the Nuclear Taboo in Doubt After Ukraine’s Drone Strikes?

The informal summit is meant to address EU defense policy in reaction to the rising threat from Russia, including issues like finance and weapons production, and give the European Commission pointers as it works on a long-term defense policy proposal. One of Monday’s main objectives is to find common ground on military equipment to be jointly developed with EU cash. However, the oversized role of Washington and American companies in Europe’s defense will loom large.

Some countries, especially those geographically close to Russia, want to buy off-the-shelf weapons to build up their militaries to face down the Kremlin, as well as produce foreign equipment under license.

Turmoil in the Time of Trump

The fight over how much cash to send within the bloc and how wide to open the door to non-EU arms-makers is already raging over the €1.5 billion European Defence Industry Programme. Although it’s small—Kosiniak-Kamysz called the size a “joke”—it’s a precursor for a planned massive increase in EU defense spending. Poland and the Baltic countries circulated a document ahead of the summit calling for the EU to spend at least €100 billion on defense by 2027, including by purchasing arms from non-EU NATO allies. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said last year the bloc should look at spending an additional €500 billion on defense over the next decade.

At the moment, the U.S. is doing very well out of Europe’s military buildup. Between mid-2022 and mid-2023, 63 percent of all EU defense orders were placed with U.S. companies, and a further 15 percent with other non-EU suppliers, according to last year’s Draghi report, which looks to make Europe more competitive. France is leading the fight for that to change—with some backing from Greece. Last week, Greek Deputy Defense Minister Yiannis Kefalogiannis said that buying more arms “developed and produced in the EU will lead to greater strategic autonomy, especially if NATO comes under pressure during Trump’s second term.”

Trade Tensions and EU Defense Strategy

The start of the summit was overshadowed by Trump declaring at the weekend that he would soon impose tariffs on imports from the EU, having just ordered similar measures on goods from Canada, Mexico, and China. Arriving leaders warned Trump against starting a trade war and said the EU would retaliate if he did so. Macron said Trump’s policies were one of several factors pushing the EU to become less dependent on others.

The EU’s 27 national leaders are expected to discuss what military capabilities they need, how they could be funded, and how they might cooperate more through joint projects. The funding discussion will be especially tough, according to diplomats, as many European countries have little room in their public finances for big spending hikes. European countries have already ramped up defense spending in recent years, in response to Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine and a growing view that they cannot rely so much on the United States to protect the continent in years to come.

Their efforts have been fueled by questions about U.S. President Donald Trump’s commitment to the NATO security alliance and by his demands for European nations to spend more on the continent’s defenses. The start of the EU summit was overshadowed by Trump declaring at the weekend that he will soon impose tariffs on imports from the EU, having ordered similar measures on goods from Canada and Mexico—which were paused on Monday—and from China. The EU leaders agreed to focus on filling critical gaps in their defenses, such as air and missile defense, missiles, ammunition, and military transport.

Long-Term Defense Spending Plans

Last year, EU countries spent an average of 1.9% of GDP on defense, or about 326 billion euros ($334.5 billion)—a 30% increase on 2021, according to EU estimates. But many EU leaders have said they will need to spend even more. The Commission, the EU’s executive body, has estimated the bloc may need to spend an extra 500 billion euros over the next decade to fill the critical gaps in European defenses. Trump has said NATO’s European members should spend 5% of GDP on defense—a figure no member of the alliance, including the United States, currently reaches.

Von der Leyen and Costa said the EU had several potential defense financing options, including national spending, an expanded role for the EU’s European Investment Bank, and private capital. Leaders avoided directly addressing in public the politically sensitive question of whether the EU should issue joint debt to pay for defense spending.

Tags: EUFranceNATORussia

Related Articles

Between Dragons and Eagles: Pakistan at the Heart of an Indo-Pacific Rivalry

Between Dragons and Eagles: Pakistan at the Heart of an Indo-Pacific Rivalry

by Ridwanul Islam
June 27, 2025

In the shadows of great power rivalry, Pakistan is no longer just a South Asian state it’s a pivot point...

Mamdani’s Victory Signals a New Era for Democrats

Why Does Palestine Shape New York’s Local Elections?

by Sifatun Nur
June 27, 2025

At first glance, it seems odd, almost laughable, that a New York City mayoral race or a Brooklyn councilwoman’s campaign...

Is the Nuclear Taboo in Doubt After Ukraine’s Drone Strikes?

Is the Nuclear Taboo in Doubt After Ukraine’s Drone Strikes?

by Sifatun Nur
June 27, 2025

A Crack in the Nuclear Shield On June 6, 2025, the Atlantic Council, a Washington-based think tank, dropped a provocative...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Diplotic

© 2024 Diplotic - The Why Behind The What

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Diplomacy
  • Economy
  • Fact Check
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Nature & Environment
  • Health & Lifestyle
  • Games & Sports
  • South Asia

© 2024 Diplotic - The Why Behind The What